For the Inquiry Two assignment, I am choosing to focus on
the same topic I used for Inquiry One, the Kony 2012 video. Rather than writing
about how the video as a whole influenced me, I would be focusing on a few
moments in the video where Invisible Children’s appeals demonstrated a variety
of rhetorical arguments and how they were successful. I am choosing this text
because I think it is valuable to learn from this organization’s success in
influencing so many people using the rhetorical appeals we have learned. Some
of the moments I know I will be focusing on are in the beginning of the video.
In the first scene, video of the earth from space plays as the narrator speaks of how the world we
live in today has changed, and how social media has extended our means of
communicating with people all over the world. I thought this was a great
introduction, as it is both visually appealing and the words are something
everyone can relate to. This shaping of the world as a foundation for instant
communication is integral for Invisible Children’s campaign and draws upon the
already populated social media community for support in their efforts. Some of
the next images include the clicking of a share button followed by two people
hugging. I thought as I watched this, are
they equating sharing by social media to actual physical interaction? What
effect does this have on their audience? On me? It’s images and situations
like these I plan on examining, and I look forward to exploring how Invisible Children’s
campaign became such a success through examination through a rhetorical lens.
I definitely think this video will be an interesting one to explore rhetorically. On one hand, the video seems to be building a community around this issue and the effectiveness is shown through its viralness. On the other hand, I'm not sure "everyone can relate to it." It might be interesting to do a little research into the demographics of those sharing the video. Not everyone is on Facebook and Youtube. And not everyone on those networks saw the video (I being one of them). In many ways, this might have to do with what we call "delivery" in rhetorical theory. They are delivering this argument a certain way. Are there downsides to that kind of delivery?
ReplyDeleteThose are just my random thoughts on the video. They may or may not be useful to you.
When you say you that the video is successful in influencing people are the people being influenced Facebook users? If so does that mean that only Facebook users would be influenced by this video or anyone who comes into contact with technology?
ReplyDelete